Monday, February 2, 2009

Super Dud

Is that really how the Super Bowl should have ended. Really? No visible replay? The league says it reviewed the play in the booth, and that it was a fumble by Kurt Warner on the second to last play of the game. First, if the booth reviewed that play where was the break in action, the guy looking at it from every angle 400 times? It’s the freaking Super Bowl, if you want to get it right any time, it’s that time. And instead we get “the networks” brushing it right under the rug like it never happened. The play from my eyes was as follows: Warner scrambled both left and right… he cocked back to throw, was being dragged down by his right throwing arm as he was trying to go from a backward motion to a forward one. At that time he still had possession, you think he should have lost it but he did not. Warner continued his forward motion, while still being dragged down, and spun the ball forward… sort of a finger roll / sling pass. How the game ended after that with no look is beyond my comprehension. That needs to be looked at by, not only, the booth, but the announcers, fans in stadium and at home. Period. And if you’re keeping track at home, and I am, the incomplete pass stops the clock, and when looked at would have given the Cardinals about 7 seconds. That’s enough time for a quick sideline play, get out of bounds and a shot with a second left. Oh and don’t forget field position. James Farrior ripped his helmet off after the game winning “fumble”… the Refs threw the flag, 15 yards… who cares, game over right? Wrong, I care, and with the non-fumble and penalty it’s Arizona ball on the 30–ish yard line. Instead we get a few looks on TV, Michaels filling and covering, Madden saying little to nothing.

Am I saying the Producers are in Al Michaels ears telling him to say fumble? Or that the Refs were told to call it that way? No. I’m asking you to consider the fact that they don’t have too. Minimizing controversy, especially during a Super Bowl is a no-brainer for rights holders like them. It’s unspoken. And by the way don’t think it’s a conspiracy, or east coast bias. I sure don’t. I just think the NFL has gotten itself so far gone regarding rules, replay, empty hand, control after a TD catch while landing but it’s not needed on a run. Inch lines and cameras, and angles and judgment of all that. The reason replay and the over kill of rules has evolved from good idea to bad execution is that they all are subject to subjectivity. The more to decide on, the more it’s up for interpretation and we all know how uniquely things can be interpreted. The answer is simple, streamline it all. Scrap reply and all that junk. If a guy jumps to catch a ball and gets pushed out-of-bounds, guess what, he’s out. That’s the defenders job, the WR is supposed to stay inbounds. Same goes for this one foot stuff. Two feet in is two feet in. Down is down, not is not. A call is a call and we move on. No looking back, no what if, nothing. Just football, and a few mistakes, because well, we’re human… and the little secret is we will never be perfect, and there will always be second guessing. It’s just crazy to try and get it right all the time when that will never happen. So why the hassle? Simple, hassle is the byproduct we have to deal with so the league has ultimate control. NFL be careful, not all your fans are stupid.

Glenn Younes
Sirius XM Satellite Radio

3 Comments:

Blogger G-Blog said...

This is an email to me then my reply.....



From: Greg H
To: Glenn Younes
Sent: Monday, February 2, 2009

Subject: Re: Super Bowl Review


I will make these 2 comments/observations about the situation and your take.

1) After the Santonio Holmes catch AL Michaels immediately made reference to how the booth was going to look at it because they had to be sure to get the call right. Yet, 3 plays later when another close call is made not even a mention of possibly looking at it upstairs. It's not like replay had not recently been on his mind.

2) As far as scrapping replay I would provide this one argument that came up as a conversation at your house. The Cardinals had a potential 3rd challenge because they had gotten their first 2 correct. This inherently means those 2 calls went against the Cardinals/for the Steelers. However, replay rectified the situation and allowed the game to go on "correctly." If not for replay the Cardinals would have had to deal with the 2 calls against them, and possibly not had that chance to win a Super Bowl as they led with under 3 minutes to play. Would that have been fair?

_________________________________________________


for the greater good of the game some will be burned and some will not.... just like replay now, it has flaws but at least it's honest, nature, instance, timely flaws.... not mistakes after getting a 2nd, 3rd, 4th etc chance. Nothing is more frustrating, plus it allows the mind to wonder down the conspiracy path and more....


Glenn

February 2, 2009 9:08 PM  
Anonymous Bryan said...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pT6KyJGa3BM&NR=1
(forgive the opening Colbert crap.... First clip I found)

Sounded to me on replay and when i watched it live Michaels was saying "they'll go under the hood to look at this...", We all saw the replay 2-3 times directly after the play.

Indisputable evidence. First call on the field is fumble, if you can see something that's is indisputably NOT a fumble from replay a few times I'd have to question your eyes. It was a fumble called on the field and while it was close to being a forward pass I can't see anything worthy of overturning that call. I will say watching this live I did think it was a incomplete pass, then first replay I quickly changed my mind.

2-3 false start penalties on the LT for Arizona, 106 total yards in penalties... Just ugly at times. I think there were 2 very questionable personal foul calls on the Cards. The somewhat late hit on Warner, to me that's were the NFL needs to stop wearing there panties! If it's a late hit to the QB's head or the guy takes 2 extra steps after the ball is released fine call it... They'll call late hit if the guy takes a half a step or 'legally' hit the QB .5 seconds after release. That's the shit that kills me. I mean I think the NFL wants to put these guys in red jersey's year round.

to your points on replay in general, I agree maybe the NFL has opened this to being too touchy a league. Get back to playing football!

February 3, 2009 6:50 AM  
Blogger G-Blog said...

I'm not worried about a team I like or not winning. I just want it right. Not saying the league or Refs wanted Pitt to win. All I'm saying is it's a little out of hand. And yes Michaels mentions the "hood" but we never had or saw a guy going under it. The NFL is going down a nerd computer path that I don't like, is all.

February 3, 2009 11:56 AM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

HTML hit counter - Quick-counter.net